Thursday, July 14, 2011

If Kobe only won rings because he had phil jackson and shaq how come?

They didn't win in '04 because the Pistons were a team with chemistry. Shaq won him his first 3 titles. Look at how dominating a force he was. In that first 3-peat, in the playoffs...Shaq averaged 30/15 the first two titles (in the playoffs) and then 28/12 in the third. Winning Finals' MVP all 3 years. They were his titles, Kobe was the sidekick. The next 2 titles, Kobe was 'the man' but he needed Gasol. That's why everyone keeps saying that Kobe needs someone else to win. He hasn't won without a prolific big man. Gasol, those 2 years, was arguably the BEST big man in the league. Shaq, those 3 years, was the best big man in the league. If you take Gasol and Shaq away from Kobe's career, it's very unlikely that he'd have a single championship.

No comments:

Post a Comment